Even the families of Americans fallen in the suicide attacks of September 11 are  wondering out loud what is really being hidden behind the smokescreen of Carla  Martin, 51, the Transportation Security Administration attorney who has come  close -- on purpose? -- to torpedoing the sentencing trial of Zacarias  Moussaoui, the alleged 20th conspirator in the tragic events.
That's not  the real secret of September 11. Of course, the government knew. Of course, Bush  became giddy enough in September 2001 at the prospect of uncontested political  war power to joke to Office of Management and Budget Director Mitch Daniels like  a college boy, "Lucky me. I hit the trifecta." (See Daniels' White House statement.)
We  know this.
The real secret of September 11 is that Osama bin Laden has a  point or three -- regardless of the obviously wrongheaded way he's gone about  advancing them.
By "Osama," I mean to represent not merely one man, but  the broad stream of Arab opinion that supports, in at least some vague fashion,  what the man is to them.
A 2004 Pew Charitable Trust survey found  that Osama is viewed favorably by large percentages in Pakistan (65%), Jordan  (55%) and Morocco (45%). In Turkey as many as 31% say that suicide attacks  against Americans and other Westerners in Iraq are justifiable, and that's a  third of the public in a wannabe member of the European Union.
Let's be  clear about this. These people are not stupid. They have reasons for feeling the  way they do that make sense to them.
They see the effects of Western  culture as it corrupts their societies. The poverty of the Palestinians next to  the relative wealth of the Israelis who displaced them. The impunity with which  U.S. troops sexually harass Arab women (and even men).
Osama bin Laden's  famous 1998 fatwa against Americans fell on deaf ears in the West, but it made  perfect sense to his audience. The charge?
"... [F]or over seven years  the United States has been occupying the lands of Islam in the holiest of  places, the Arabian Peninsula, plundering its riches, dictating to its rulers,  humiliating its people, terrorizing its neighbors, and turning its bases in the  Peninsula into a spearhead through which to fight the neighboring Muslim  peoples."
The fatwa goes on to cite the effects of bombing on Iraq --  when we were supposedly no longer at war -- in a tally it gives of 1 million  lives. This may be inflated, but even half is ten times all the U.S. casualties  n Vietnam. Finally, it cites the U.S. alliance with Israel and its support of  the "occupation" of Jerusalem.
Turn it around for a moment. Imagine the  Fedayeen in Rome, Canterbury or Jerusalem riding around as conquerors and  setting up bases to attack London and New York, killing 500,000 in "collateral"  effects of air raids, while remaining allied to the most hated enemy,  Osama.
It takes a little imagination because we are so secularized that  nothing is "holy" or sacred to us anymore. OK, so imagine the roughest, most  dust-covered, bearded Arab ruffian -- a ruffian just as the U.S. Army has had in  every war -- setting upon your daughter or your son. Close to home  enough?
What doesn't make sense is not their perspective, but  ours.
In a recent discussion with a professional who has lived in several  continents abroad, I fell into a classic North-South debate -- "North"  representing the industrialized First and Second Worlds and "South" the  industrializing Third and Fourth. My friend was arguing that Western overseas  development assistance makes life "better" abroad.
I countered that  "better" is in the eye of the beholder. To Osama's buddies, I added, U.S.  plumbing and automobiles comes with the baggage of U.S. culture -- to them,  notably the proliferation of pornography, immorality, secularism,  homosexuality.
Then my interlocutor, a woman, drew a line in the sand:  their oppression of women is unjustifiable.
This reminded me of Vietnam  War escalation architect Robert McNamara when, in his role as World Bank  president in the late 1960s, he tried to sell the Latin American public on a  subsidized birth control campaign. From the U.S. perspective, this seems like  bringing "progress." (It's also cheaper than aid.)
But McNamara succeeded  as no politician has since, in uniting the Brazilian Catholic bishops with the  Communist Party in sheer outrage. The American was seen as proposing  genocide.
Similarly, what a professional U.S. woman sees as "oppression"  in the Arab World is a way of life whose evolution is best left in the hands of  the societies in which it occurs, rather than the arrogant control of Western  paternalism. I would not choose that way of life myself, but I am  Western.
Also, it's not as if the West is oppression-free or does not  exploit women in other areas of the world.
Let's look at the women who  pick oranges in Florida and California before we get too outraged at the Arabs.  Let's examine the "sex tours" and "foreign bride" businesses, the drug "mules."  Let's examine just how many millions of women in the world have seen their  families destroyed by Western weapons and greed.
My point is that,  precisely because we are empirical-minded and supposedly more democratic, it  does not make sense for us to determine a priori that everyone must embrace this  or that non-negotiable item of our way of life. Especially when we don't show  the guts to stop our own governments from waging war indiscriminately and  unjustifiably against their populations.
Until we learn this, we will be  stuck in a clash of civilizations that threatens both the West and the Arab  World, with the same perversity of the Mutual Assured Destruction equation of  the Cold War. The more each of us insists we are correct beyond discussion, the  less a chance there is that either will survive.
Let's face it. Sooner or  later, al-Qaeda will wipe out half a U.S. city with a dirty bomb or a virus or  something even simpler of which no one has thought. And sooner rather than  later, the White House will drop The Bomb somewhere in the Arab World in  response. Then all bets are off.
As Albert Einstein famously remarked: "I  know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will  be fought with sticks and stones."
Is there a way out? Only if we take a  good look at the real secret of September 11.